I am having some difficulty with APEX and restricting it to run on a specific Record type. Requirement: We recently implanting a technical solution whereby Chatters Post and Comments would automatically publish to Request Comments. Functionality: The solution works as expected – Chatter Post and Comments post to Requests Comments, I have isolated the Apex class to only run on the record type ‘UK_Pricing_Query’ on the Process. Challenge: We have set the Apex Class to only run on 1 Record Type via the Process Builder and this works – to some extent. Chatter Posts will only be copied to the Requests comments on that record type, however when a user comments on a chatter post this transfers to the request comments regardless of what record type it is. The Chatter post itself doesn’t copy to the request comments (That’s the process builder criteria kicking in) but if a user comments on a post it will copy across. I believe we are going to have to define the Record type within either the Apex Trigger or the Class – this is where my knowledge drops out. Could anyone potentially offer some assistance? **Trigger:** trigger CaseCommentSyncFeedCommentBeforeTrigger on FeedComment (before insert) { CaseFeedCommentSyncUtils.caseFeedCommentToCaseComment(trigger.new); } **APEX Class:** /** @param COMMENTINSERT Used to indicate feed item to case comment action @param FEEDREMOVAL Used to indicate removal of a duplicate feed item action @description This class handles all logic for syncing Feed Items and Feed Comments from a Case record feed to a Case Comment; */ global class CaseFeedCommentSyncUtils { global static String COMMENTINSERT = 'FeedItem2Case'; global static String FEEDREMOVAL = 'CaseCommentFeedItemDeletion'; final static String FROMCHATTER = 'Comment Made From Chatter'; /** @description The class contains Invocable variables to used as sync parameters in conjunction with process builder. */ global class SyncParameter{ @InvocableVariable(Label = 'Sync Type' Description = 'Indicates Feed sync or feed item removal' Required = true) global String syncType; @InvocableVariable(Label = 'Feed Body' Description = 'Body of the chatter post') global String feedBody; @InvocableVariable( Label = 'CreatedById' Description = 'Record Id of the User that created the new record') global String createdById; @InvocableVariable(Label = 'Parent Id' Description = 'Id of parent record, feed item or case comment' Required = true) global String parentId; } /** @param syncParam List of type SyncParameter. @description This method takes a list of type SyncParameter and determines the correct action that needs to be taken based on SyncParameter.syncType. CaseComment records will be inserted or duplicate feed items will be removed. */ @InvocableMethod global static void chatterFeedToCaseComment(List<SyncParameter> syncParams){ //if syncType if Case Comment insertion, create case comment object if(syncParams[0].syncType == COMMENTINSERT){ String feedBody = syncParams[0].feedBody; String parentId = syncParams[0].parentId; CaseComment cc = feedBody != null && parentId != null ? new CaseComment(CommentBody = feedBody.stripHtmlTags() + + '\n\n ' + FROMCHATTER, ParentId = parentId) : null; if(cc != null){ try{ insert cc; }catch(Exception caseCommentInsEx){ system.debug(LoggingLevel.ERROR, 'Case Comment Insert Error: ' + caseCommentInsEx.getMessage()); } } } //if syncType is duplicate feed item removal find all duplicate feed items from case feed and delete else if(syncParams[0].syncType == FEEDREMOVAL){ List<Id> delFeedIds = new List<Id>(); ConnectApi.FeedElementPage feedPage = Connectapi.ChatterFeeds.getFeedElementsFromFeed(null, ConnectApi.feedtype.Record, syncParams[0].parentId); system.debug(LoggingLevel.ERROR, 'Feed Page for Case: ' + feedPage); if(feedPage != null){ for(ConnectApi.FeedElement elem : feedPage.elements){ if(elem.capabilities != null){ if(elem.capabilities.caseComment != null){ String caseCommentTxt = elem.capabilities.caseComment.text != null ? elem.capabilities.caseComment.text : ''; if(caseCommentTxt.contains(FROMCHATTER)){ String currPageUrl = elem.capabilities.chatterLikes.page.currentPageUrl; List<String> urlSplit = currPageUrl.split('/'); delFeedIds.add(urlSplit[6]); } } } } try{ List<database.DeleteResult> delRes = !delFeedIds.isEmpty() ? Database.delete(delFeedIds) : null; }catch(DMLException feedDelEx){ system.debug(LoggingLevel.ERROR, 'error during feed item deletion: ' + feedDelEx.getMessage()); } } } } /** @param feedcomments A list of type Feed Comments @description This method takes a list of feed comments and creates a corresponding case comment if the feed comment is part of a case feed.s */ global static void caseFeedCommentToCaseComment(List<FeedComment> feedComments){ List<CaseComment> caseComments = new List<CaseComment>(); for(FeedComment feedCom : feedComments){ String parentId = (String)feedCom.ParentId; if(parentId.startsWith('500')){ CaseComment cc = new CaseComment(ParentId = feedCom.ParentId, CommentBody = feedCom.CommentBody + '\n\n' + FROMCHATTER); caseComments.add(cc); } } try{ List<Database.SaveResult> insRes = !caseComments.isEmpty() ? Database.insert(caseComments) : null; }catch(DMLException commentInsEx){ system.debug('Error during case comment insertion: ' + commentInsEx.getMessage()); } } } I am wanting to isolate this to run on the UK_Pricing_Query Record Type. Thanks in Advance guys! Kind Regards, Liam