2

Salesforce seems to lack a security model around a records and their children as it pertains to Chatter groups (Salesforce user groups have one).

Chatter groups can't own sObjects that secures them from access by non-group members.

Do people just avoid using chatter groups to collaborate around sObjects? Or do they implement standard groups whenever they need security around an object?

Thoughts?

  • why wounldn't you do the collab on the sobject record itself? – superfell Aug 21 '12 at 16:35
3

Jordan, Very good question. It's been awhile since I've worked on Chatter groups, but I recall the same limitation. Our solution, as you suggest, was to "link" the Chatter groups to a standard group and control sharing access that way.

|improve this answer|||||
2

This is a big problem with Chatter that is affecting both customer adoption and the options for developers building Chatter-integrated apps.

Please vote for the idea to get it fixed and hopefully we can get some attention from Salesforce.

|improve this answer|||||

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.