I have a helper method in my code called canQueryObject, and that method returns a boolean. I have some code that calls the method via the following line of code:

if(!myObjectHelper.canQueryObject(Schema.SObjectType.<<objectType>>)){ ... }

I'd like to test some scenarios where the scenario is false. Is there a way I can use Mock or Stubs in a unit-test to set canQueryObject to false?

  • Can you create a user in your test that has no access to the object then runAs that use? – Eric Apr 24 at 4:25

I typically use a fairly simple pattern and don't bring in a framework. It would look something like the following:

public virtual with sharing class MyObjectHelper
    static MyObjectHelper instance = new MyObjectHelper();
    @TestVisible static void setMock(MyObjectHelper mock) { instance = mock; }

    public static Boolean canQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
        return instance.getCanQueryObject(sObjectType);

    // the two method names cannot match or you will get a compile fail
    protected virtual Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
        return sObjectType.getDescribe().isQueryable();

Then in your test, you can have a mock return always true or always false, as you wish.

class MyObjectHelperTests
    class HelperMock extends MyObjectHelper
        Boolean isQueryable = true;
        protected override Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
            return isQueryable;

    @IsTest static void testCannotQuery()
        HelperMock mock = new HelperMock();
        mock.isQueryable = false;

            Boolean canQuery = MyObjectHelper.canQueryObject(...);

        system.assertEquals(false, canQuery, 'Some informative message');

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.