Till I post this question, I was in assumption that the answer for my question is "No, it is not possible to update owner of a record to a user who does not have Read access at the object level". But, my simple tiny program made me so confused.

Here is the scenario, Let us consider there are two users:

  1. 'Admin User'(Myslef) - having System Admin profile
  2. 'Restricted User' - having some custom profile, and does not have read access on Account object. Do not have View All an Modify All permissions, and no other permission sets are assigned.

Now, I(Admin user) have created an Account record in standard UI; let's say A1 is the record. As expected in this case, the user who created becomes the owner by default.

Now, when I try to change the owner of that record to 'Restricted User'(who does not have read access on Account) in Standard UI by clicking on 'Change' link at the owner field, I am getting 'Transfer Requires Read - The new owner must have "Read" permissions on this type of record.' error. This is expected, as per my knowledge.

But, when I try to change the owner of that record to 'Restricted User'(who does not have read access on Account) using Apex, I am able to change the owner successfully, which I didn't expect. I have used the below code for updating the owner:

    Account acc = new Account();
    acc.Id='00190000024XXXX'; //Record Id
    acc.OwnerId = '0059000000XXXXX'; //Restricted User Id
    update acc;

I have tried this in three different places/ways: 1.Running as Anonymous Code in Developer Console, 2.in Apex Cpntroller using Without Sharing, 3.in Apex Cpntroller using With Sharing. It is getting succeeded in all the three ways.

Can some help me to understand, if this is expected behavior, or is there any silly mistake that I might be doing.

Let's say this is expected behavior, then what is the purpose of System.DmlException: Update failed. first error: TRANSFER_REQUIRES_READ, The new owner must have read permission: [] exception, and when does it will throw if the above scenario is expected.

2 Answers 2


Being an owner won't magically allow you to view that record if you don't have Permission to View that Object.

Profile Permission means do you have the ability to read or edit(OBJECT BASIS), Can I edit/view account?

OWD/Sharing/Owner means do you have access to that record or not(RECORD By RECORD BASIS). Do I have access to edit/view this specific account record?

So coming to your question. The Restricted profile User can be owner, It means he can Access the record if he has permission to view the Object. As OwnerID is just a field in the database, its nothing more than having a text field.

In Standard UI(Transfer Owner Wizard) , SF UI Presentation Layer(Change Owner Button) has added few extra validations to alert all users when they share or change ownership if that assigned user won't be able to access that record(Low price licenses which do not have Apex)

src: https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=jDYfTfaqclk

According to Salesfoce Knowledge :

If the transfer is blocked because of the first three options, you need to see whether you can prevent transfer of those records, before the transfer. This can be done by assigning the mentioned records to another user, who is not the current owner, or closing them off.

A) Depending on the Profile, or License used, you might check whether you can provide more access, maybe the Profile does not allow for access, but the license could, in which case you could add extra permissions to the Profile to broaden access.

B) A user with a Salesforce license, has the broadest permissions, if you would use a different license, a Community kind of license, a Force.com license type, or maybe a Chatter license type, access to objects might be different, and you might not all be able to give permission to the related objects

C) Another option, would be, to not use the Salesforce 'Change Ownership' link, which starts the transfer wizard. Instead you might use automation which does not change the ownership of any related records.

All the above mention this error when standard change ownership is used. Same validations don't apply in Custom Apex, as there is No SF UI presentation layer to enforce it.


  • Thanks for the quick reply. As you said, if it is allowed to change owner to Restricted user then when does 'TRANSFER_REQUIRES_READ' DmlException comes. I have amended my question to add this info too. Thanks.
    – Azeez
    May 11, 2018 at 11:47
  • Are you using change ownership wizard? May 11, 2018 at 11:53
  • As I mentioned in my question, yes I am using standard change ownership page(baseurl/record_id/a) as well as Apex, whereas the former approach is throwing error but the later one is not.
    – Azeez
    May 11, 2018 at 12:00
  • updated answer, with knowledge base articles.. May 11, 2018 at 12:03

In order to make an user the owner of the record, then the user must have at least Read permission on the object.

Below is the link: https://help.salesforce.com/articleView?id=account_owner.htm&type=5

Thanks, Govind Narayan Sharma

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.