Timeline for is recordId passed to lwc in a quick action?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2022 at 15:43 | comment | added | Kris Goncalves |
Interesting. In a quick test with the setter, that only works if you add @api recordId; so it seems, as an example, incomplete or confusing as to why the setter would be needed at all (considering @api recordId only works). I'll see if I can ask the people who wrote that doc.
|
|
| Sep 30, 2022 at 15:24 | comment | added | Bryan Anderson | @Kris Goncalves thanks for showing this. I wonder how come the official documentation does not show this way developer.salesforce.com/docs/component-library/documentation/… | |
| Mar 19, 2022 at 14:07 | history | edited | Kris Goncalves | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 595 characters in body
|
| Nov 10, 2021 at 21:02 | history | edited | Kris Goncalves | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
code highlighting and clearer distinction for screenaction behavior
|
| Jun 16, 2021 at 17:38 | history | edited | Kris Goncalves | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 79 characters in body
|
| Jun 16, 2021 at 14:17 | history | edited | Kris Goncalves | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Jun 16, 2021 at 14:09 | vote | accept | joacoiudica | ||
| Jun 16, 2021 at 14:09 | comment | added | joacoiudica | Yes, this is exactly it. when I rendered the record Id in my html, it showed, so it is being passed correctly, just a life cycle thing. Thanks for the details! | |
| Jun 16, 2021 at 14:05 | history | answered | Kris Goncalves | CC BY-SA 4.0 |