Timeline for Generic Platform Event - Centralize routing or not?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2021 at 14:36 | vote | accept | Robert Sösemann | ||
| S May 17, 2021 at 0:02 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S May 17, 2021 at 0:02 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| May 13, 2021 at 18:43 | comment | added | MLucci | Maybe I'm not seeing something (smt in the documentation, or smt obvious) and my question has a simple answer, I think it connects with your original topic and question around if/why/which event handler architecture to choose. Thank you for coming back with a reply 🌻 | |
| May 13, 2021 at 18:39 | comment | added | MLucci | Scenario: one event, multiple unmanaged/uncontrolled apex triggers (one from your app, others from subscribers). We don't care the order in which subscribers process a single event. My question is, if a single subscriber fails (excepts), does processing of events move forward with new events for all other subscribers? For a single subscriver an uncaught expection causes "the train" to stop for the apex handler (i.e. next batch of new events are not processed until recovery/success) afair. What's the behavior when there are multiple apex subscribers working on the same event stream? | |
| May 13, 2021 at 18:21 | comment | added | Robert Sösemann | @MLucci not sure if I get your ordering problem. All processes wait for single events with distinct topics like ids. | |
| May 10, 2021 at 12:17 | comment | added | MLucci | Your question reminded some (unfinished) reasoning from months ago, at the time it was around using multiple events or not, order of execution, error handling, batching, etc... One question for you (maybe useful for your considerations, maybe you'll teach me smt :) -- in a "one event-multiple subscribers" architecture that doesn't keep control over subscribers (over event processing batch size and/or error handling)... what happens if a handler halts on event ID = 4? Does the processing of events go forward with event ID = 5 [without a secure wrapper in the middle that keeps the boat afloat]? | |
| S May 8, 2021 at 22:30 | history | bounty started | Robert Sösemann | ||
| S May 8, 2021 at 22:30 | history | notice added | Robert Sösemann | Draw attention | |
| May 7, 2021 at 16:43 | answer | added | Kevin Jones | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 6, 2021 at 23:32 | history | became hot network question | |||
| May 6, 2021 at 21:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSalesforce/status/1390411055415939073 | ||
| May 6, 2021 at 15:55 | answer | added | Adrian Larson♦ | timeline score: 4 | |
| May 6, 2021 at 15:47 | comment | added | Robert Sösemann | Complicated answer: I don't know in advance and I don't want to care about, because aligning the efforts of alls subscribers will not be possible. | |
| May 6, 2021 at 15:43 | comment | added | Adrian Larson♦ | ^ That was my question. How much overlap is there between subscriber logic? | |
| May 6, 2021 at 15:41 | comment | added | Robert Sösemann | I'm sure there will be a super answer soon, even for the given limited information. But I'm happy to answer specific questions. | |
| May 6, 2021 at 15:39 | comment | added | Adrian Larson♦ | It's hard to tell based on the information given how much overlap there might be between subscribers. Maybe some high level examples of what they do would help tie it together. To me, that's a core aspect of the solution space. | |
| May 6, 2021 at 15:32 | history | asked | Robert Sösemann | CC BY-SA 4.0 |