Timeline for confused on force:recordData!
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2018 at 8:25 | answer | added | itsmebasti | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 9, 2018 at 9:49 | answer | added | Mohith Shrivastava | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jan 9, 2018 at 8:28 | comment | added | Keith C | @MohithShrivastava I think your comment is better than my answer so would be worth posting as an answer that can be accepted... | |
| Jan 9, 2018 at 5:38 | vote | accept | Prasanth Srinivasan | ||
| Jan 9, 2018 at 4:36 | comment | added | Prasanth Srinivasan | Hi Mohith Shrivastava, Thank you. So we can ignore the attribute target Record and we not create the attribute called newContact. Please confirm. | |
| Jan 8, 2018 at 13:42 | comment | added | Mohith Shrivastava | This change was introduced when the Dataservice was out from pilot .Using the targetRecord the syntax was too longer and the targetFields simplified it further .Recommend using targetFields and you can drop the tragetRecord . | |
| Jan 8, 2018 at 13:35 | answer | added | Keith C | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jan 8, 2018 at 13:24 | history | asked | Prasanth Srinivasan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |