Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 12, 2017 at 17:54 comment added Joseph Nardone Thanks - I think the answer was good. The most common method if you want to securely store the images is to put them in documents and reference the file id in Product2. I think it is safe to assume that Salesforce's recommended method would be the one that they used in their own app where they reference the file id of the image file in documents through a custom field with api name Image_Document_ID__c.
Nov 12, 2017 at 17:25 vote accept Joseph Nardone
Nov 12, 2017 at 15:52 comment added glls since we don't have specifics on your particular use case, it is kind of hard to recommend anything. do take into consideration sfdcfox's comment in regards to the quantity of images and scalability.
Nov 12, 2017 at 1:52 comment added Joseph Nardone Thanks for the great references. The blog and the Force Labs app both store the product image in documents and reference it with a custom field in Product2 that contains the image file Id. Unfortunately, the blog uses Image_ID__c for the field api name while Force Labs uses Image_Document_ID__c. I think I will assume that more organizations will use the Force Labs field api name and go with that.
Nov 11, 2017 at 20:42 history edited glls CC BY-SA 3.0
added 202 characters in body
Nov 11, 2017 at 19:50 comment added sfdcfox We sell RVs, so we take pictures of every single one we have on our lots, to show their condition and features, so like 20-40 per RV. Close to 99.99% of our image storage is asset-related.
Nov 11, 2017 at 19:40 comment added glls that is a lot of images, are they mostly associated to 1 object?
Nov 11, 2017 at 19:30 comment added sfdcfox We do use AWS but we have something like 40m images which wouldn't be practical in Salesforce storage.
Nov 11, 2017 at 18:39 history edited glls CC BY-SA 3.0
added 199 characters in body
Nov 11, 2017 at 18:27 history answered glls CC BY-SA 3.0