Timeline for Plans for obfuscation of Lightning Component source when delivered in a managed package?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2018 at 10:13 | comment | added | VarunC | It should also be noted that the Managed Package Lightning Component's full code including cmp, controller, helper is viewable just like u r editing in Eclipse IDE | |
| Aug 18, 2017 at 5:26 | answer | added | Diego | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jun 16, 2017 at 20:40 | comment | added | Scott Morrison | Or they'll buy one of your competitors :D | |
| Jun 16, 2017 at 20:38 | comment | added | Scott Morrison | Wouldn't worry to much about it, if your code's really good salesforce will come out with a competing product anyway ;) | |
| May 7, 2017 at 11:34 | comment | added | Christian Szandor Knapp | Agreed. Personally I don't mind but I'm getting the question a lot during dev groups. I wonder if the code is maybe obfuscated in production org with debug disabled/secure cache enabled. Haven't tried that yet | |
| May 7, 2017 at 10:43 | comment | added | Keith C | @ChristianSzandorKnapp What is possible is limited by what browsers can do so AFAIK obfuscation is the best that can be done. | |
| May 7, 2017 at 8:27 | comment | added | Christian Szandor Knapp | Whereas Apex hides my ugly code (or intellectual property), I agree with Mohith that Salesforce needs to address how they will protect my investment in the packaged application I am delivering in Lightning. Obfuscation will not really solve this problem. | |
| May 7, 2017 at 5:23 | comment | added | Mohith Shrivastava | Lightning component Helper and Controller consists of Javascript code .Technically you cannot make it hidden completely .At best they can minify it and feel its a bug currently that needs addressing . | |
| May 7, 2017 at 0:15 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSalesforce/status/861011560633843712 | ||
| May 6, 2017 at 22:12 | history | asked | Keith C | CC BY-SA 3.0 |