Timeline for Suggestion to avoid for loop inside a for loop
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2017 at 6:20 | history | edited | Adrian Larson♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Jan 25, 2017 at 5:57 | comment | added | Adrian Larson♦ | I think that's the number that they used to have in the documentation (looks like it's 31 now). I don't know that it matters, but multiplying by a prime number might reduce chances of hash collision. | |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 5:48 | comment | added | Eric | @AdrianLarson - Why did you use 37? Just a random number or does the value of 37 have a specific use other than multiplier | |
| Jan 22, 2017 at 16:31 | comment | added | Eric | Wish you could favorite an answer...... | |
| Jan 22, 2017 at 5:44 | comment | added | Eric | +1 for the good use case and use of the word "grok" (learned a new word today) | |
| Jan 22, 2017 at 0:38 | history | answered | Adrian Larson♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |