Return to Question

In apex you can create your own REST services quite simply:

@RestResource(urlMapping='/DUMMY/v1/*')
global class REST_Service {
@HttpGet
    global static string getDummytMessage(){
        return 'DUMMY DATA';
    }
}

Salesforce does not allow such a class to be annotated as @ReadOnly, I would like to understand and know why this is the case.

update: potentially there is no technical reason and its just not there out of a project management perspective. I've created an idea to put it on the radar.

In apex you can create your own REST services quite simply:

@RestResource(urlMapping='/DUMMY/v1/*')
global class REST_Service {
@HttpGet
    global static string getDummytMessage(){
        return 'DUMMY DATA';
    }
}

Salesforce does not allow such a class to be annotated as @ReadOnly, I would like to understand and know why this is the case.

update: potentially there is no technical reason and its just not there out of a project management perspective. I've created an idea to put it on the radar.

In apex you can create your own REST servicesses quite simply:

@RestResource(urlMapping='/DUMMY/v1/*')
global class REST_Service {
@HttpGet
    global static string getDummytMessage(){
        return 'DUMMY DATA';
    }
}

Salesforce does not allow such a class to be annotated as @ReadOnly, I would like to understand and know why this is the case.

update: potentially there is no technical reason and its just not there out of a project management perspective. I've created an idea to put it on the radar.

In apex you can create your own REST services quite simply:

@RestResource(urlMapping='/DUMMY/v1/*')
global class REST_Service {
@HttpGet
    global static string getDummytMessage(){
        return 'DUMMY DATA';
    }
}

Salesforce does not allow such a class to be annotated as @ReadOnly, I would like to understand and know why this is the case.

update: potentially there is no technical reason and its just not there out of a project management perspective. I've created an idea to put it on the radar.

In apex you can create your own REST servicesses quite simply:

@RestResource(urlMapping='/DUMMY/v1/*')
global class REST_Service {
@HttpGet
    global static string getDummytMessage(){
        return 'DUMMY DATA';
    }
}

Salesforce does not allow such a class to be annotated as @ReadOnly, I would like to understand and know why this is the case.

In apex you can create your own REST servicesses quite simply:

@RestResource(urlMapping='/DUMMY/v1/*')
global class REST_Service {
@HttpGet
    global static string getDummytMessage(){
        return 'DUMMY DATA';
    }
}

Salesforce does not allow such a class to be annotated as @ReadOnly, I would like to understand and know why this is the case.

update: potentially there is no technical reason and its just not there out of a project management perspective. I've created an idea to put it on the radar.